Hubstaff monitors employees. Chronixo monitors work - with privacy built in.
Hubstaff stores screenshot data on their servers. Chronixo routes all screenshots to your own AWS S3, GCP, or Azure Blob - so your employee data never leaves your cloud. Plus a native client portal and sprint planning.
Chronixo vs. Hubstaff
Everything Hubstaff leaves you piecing together - and how Chronixo delivers it in one platform.
Hubstaff vs. Chronixo, feature by feature
A feature-by-feature look at where Hubstaff stops short and Chronixo keeps going.
| Feature | Hubstaff | Chronixo |
|---|---|---|
| Screenshot monitoring | ✓ | ✓BYOS S3 - your cloud |
| Client portal | ✗ | ✓Yes Included |
| Sprint planning | ✗ | ✓Yes Exclusive |
| 4-level approval | ✗ | ✓Yes Exclusive |
| Keystroke logging | ✓ | ✗Never |
| BYOS S3 storage | ✗ | ✓Yes Free on paid plans |
| Activity % tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
Why agencies move from Hubstaff to Chronixo
The real reasons agencies replace Hubstaff with Chronixo.
Privacy and data sovereignty
Hubstaff stores screenshots on their servers. For agencies with NDAs, healthcare clients, or GDPR obligations, that creates a compliance exposure. Chronixo's BYOS S3 routes every screenshot directly to your cloud - Chronixo only receives metadata.
No client portal
Hubstaff has no built-in client portal. Clients wanting to see project status or review timesheets get a PDF export at best.
No sprint planning
Hubstaff is monitoring and time tracking. There is no sprint planning, velocity tracking, or native project management - agencies using Scrum still need a separate PM tool.